|
When
choosing among the various sectors of the economy,
our firm focuses on two specific criteria;
1.
Superior Investment Performance
2.
Low
Correlation
Table
3.2, Source: “Long-Term
Returns on the Original S&P 500 Companies.” 1957-2005
, Jeremy Seigel, Financial
Analysts Journal, (Jan/Feb 2006).
Additional returns by Lipper Inc; A Reuters
Company., 2005-2009. Financials
measured by Financial Services Funds, Healthcare by
Healthcare/Biotechnology Funds, Energy by Natural Resources Funds,
and Technology by Science and Technology Funds.
In
examining the past performance of the major sectors, four maintained
superior performance over the S&P 500 Index; healthcare,
energy, technology, and financials. These
three sectors all significantly outperformed the S&P 500 stock
index for the 50-year period ending
December 31, 2007
.
Due to this impressive performance, we utilize these four
sectors for a large component of our equity portfolios.
The
primary benefit of adding energy stocks are the risk benefits.
Energy stocks are an excellent choice based upon their low
correlation to the other three sectors.
They also provide a portfolio hedge against inflation.
Inflation has an adverse impact on the stock market.
In the last two periods of high inflation (1974, 1979),
stocks performed very poorly.
We therefore view the energy sector as a key ingredient in a
diversified global portfolio.
Our
goal as portfolio managers is not only to deliver superior returns
to our clients, but also minimize risk.
One advantage of investing in our four recommended sectors
are the low historical correlations that these four sectors possess.
Below are the correlations for these four sectors in the
previous ten years.
Sector Financials
Healthcare
Energy
Technology
Financials
1.0
0.64
0.45 0.30
Healthcare
1.00
0.19
0.07
Energy
1.00
0.02
Technology
1.00
Source:
MSCI World, 1992-2007
The
highest correlated sectors are the healthcare and financials; with a
0.64 correlation.
This is considered moderately high.
However, all other correlations within the chart are at a
0.45 or less.
Some relationships are exceptionally low.
Healthcare and technology have a minuscule 0.07 correlation.
Energy and healthcare have a diminutive 0.19 correlation.
These low correlations mean that although these sectors offer
high performance, they do so at different times.
Therefore, if healthcare stocks do exceptionally well, one or
more of the other sectors is most likely doing poorly.
This see-saw relationship actually lowers volatility.
Due to these findings, these four sectors, in combination,
offer our investors the best opportunity to outperform the stock
market averages on a risk-adjusted basis.
Our
offered portfolios for individuals, separate account programs, and
institutional pension clients utilize this distinctive sector
approach.
Approximately 75% of each portfolio is invested in these
sectors.
The balance (25%) is invested in other sectors of the economy
that we believe offer the most value.
Since inception, our managed portfolios have outperformed
their respective indices by a wide margin.
We expect that our distinctive sector strategy will allow us
to continue this historical trend of outperformance.
Timothy J. McIntosh, CIO
April 9, 2010
|